January 17, 2017

Port of Oakland rejects coal export terminal–Bay Chapter launches coal campaign with victory

On Feb. 27 the Port of Oakland Board of Commissioners rejected a proposal to build a dirty, dangerous coal and petroleum-coke export facility.

Citing environmental impacts, climate change, public-health hazards, economic pitfalls, and public opposition, the commissioners voted unanimously to reject Bowie Resource Partners’ proposal for an 8.3-million-ton-per-year bulk-export facility at the 50-acre Charles P. Howard Terminal. The facility would have exported over four million tons of coal and one million tons of petroleum coke (petcoke) annually.

Another proposal from Kinder Morgan, Metro Ports, and California Capital Investment Group might also have included a fossil-fuel-export component. This proposal lacked sufficient information to be fully considered, and was also rejected. Note that Kinder Morgan last year had abandoned plans for a coal export terminal at the Port of St. Helens on the Columbia River in Oregon, and Metro Ports walked away from plans for a coal export terminal in Coos Bay, OR.

Coal dust and particulate matter from diesel engines, coming from numerous mile-long open-top trains, would pose significant threats to Bay Area air and water quality. Coal breaks apart easily to create dust and contains mercury, arsenic, uranium, and hundreds of other toxins harmful to humans and marine animals. Petcoke, a byproduct of refining dirty and heavy crudes such as tar-sands oil, is transported and stored like coal and has similar adverse impacts. Port of Oakland staff had recommended rejecting the proposals due to air-quality and other environmental concerns, as well as the climate impacts of burning coal abroad.

“West Oakland already faces a disproportionate burden from illnesses associated with air pollution. The rate of asthma hospitalization visits in West Oakland is over two times higher than the Alameda County rate and one of the highest in the county,” said Nile Malloy, northern California program director for Communities for a Better Environment.

There are other potential proposals to develop coal and petcoke export facilities at the Oakland Army Base, the Port of Oakland, and the Port of Richmond. There are currently two facilities that export coal in the Bay Area: the privately owned Levin-Richmond Terminal and the Port of Stockton.

Coal companies have been seeking to massively expand exports of coal—particularly from the West Coast—in the face of declining U.S. markets. Only three of the original six coal export facilities proposed for the Northwest are still in consideration, due to the opposition from tens of thousands of residents and a coalition called Power Past Coal. The Bay Chapter is working with West Oakland Environmental Indicators Project, Communities for a Better Environment, San Francisco BayKeeper, and Earthjustice to mount heavy opposition to any proposal for coal or petcoke export facilities in the Bay Area.

Comments

  1. With havin so much content and articles do you ever run into any problems of plagorism or copyright infringement? My website has a lot of unique content I’ve either authored myself or outsourced but it seems a lot of it is popping it up all over the internet without my authorization. Do you know any solutions to help stop content from being ripped off? I’d certainly appreciate it.

  2. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point. You clearly know what youre talking about, why throw away your intelligence on just posting videos to your blog when you could be giving us something enlightening to read?

  3. Hmm is anyone else having problems with the pictures on this blog loading? I’m trying to determine if its a problem on my end or if it’s the blog. Any feed-back would be greatly appreciated.

  4. Hey there! I know this is kind of off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this website? I’m getting tired of WordPress because I’ve had issues with hackers and I’m looking at alternatives for another platform. I would be great if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

  5. Hey there! Do you know if they make any plugins to help with SEO? I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good results. If you know of any please share. Many thanks!

  6. We absolutely love your blog and find many of your post’s to be just what I’m looking for. Does one offer guest writers to write content available for you? I wouldn’t mind writing a post or elaborating on many of the subjects you write in relation to here. Again, awesome site!

  7. I merely hope to tell you that I am new to wordpress blogging and extremely cherished your page. Most likely I am prone to save your blog post . You literally have impressive article blog posts. Appreciate it for expressing with us all of your site document

  8. Hello this is kinda of off topic but I was wondering if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML. I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding expertise so I wanted to get advice from someone with experience. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

  9. At this time it sounds like Drupal is the top blogging platform out there right now. (from what I’ve read) Is that what you are using on your blog?

  10. Exceptional post however , I was wanting to know if you could write a litte more on this topic? I’d be very grateful if you could elaborate a little bit further. Cheers!

Speak Your Mind

*