October 31, 2014

The perfect unacceptable use

Former San Francisco Mayor Art Agnos calls this “the most beautiful spot on the waterfront”. Should this land be used for the Warriors’ sports arena or for better public access to the shoreline? Photo courtesy San Francisco Waterfront Alliance.

Former San Francisco Mayor Art Agnos calls this “the most beautiful spot on the waterfront”. Should this land be used for the Warriors’ sports arena or for better public access to the shoreline? Photo courtesy San Francisco Waterfront Alliance.

San Francisco’s Proposition H of 1990, the Waterfront Land Use Plan, reserves the waterfront “for maritime uses, public access, and projects which aid in the preservation and restoration of the environment”. It specifically prohibits hotels, and sets straightforward criteria for defining an “unacceptable” land use:

  • does it need to be located on the waterfront to serve its basic function?
  • is it compatible with existing or planned maritime operation on surrounding parcels?
  • does it provide the maximum feasible public access?
  • does it improve the ecological balance of San Francisco Bay?
  • does it protect the waterfront’s architectural heritage?
  • does it present the best interests of the people of San Francisco?

Do these criteria sound like a description of the Warriors’ proposal?

Speak Your Mind

*